The Moscow District Arbitration Court upheld the decisions of lower courts to refuse to include the opponent’s claims in the register of creditors of CB “Alta-Bank” (Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”) in the amount of almost 7 million rubles (the interests of the client were defended by trainee Andrey Khokhlov).
The second court of cassation of General jurisdiction upheld the court decisions of the lower courts to recover the debt in favor of the JSCB “MIR” (the interests were represented by assistant lawyer Diana Shkvarkina).
In Vladivostok, the Fifth arbitration court of appeal also upheld a judicial act (that was previously issued upon “De Jure” statement) to declare the transaction for 11.5 million rubles invalid (representative of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” is trainee lawyer Oleg Zubkov).
The arbitration court of Primorsky Krai resolved disputes that had arisen between the bankruptcy Trustee and the Creditors’ Committee. The court sided with the Client of MCBA “De jure” and admitted that the proposed cost estimate for approval meets the requirements of the law and does not violate the interests of creditors. The same court, based on the results of the examination of 4 objections prepared by MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” to the application of the Russian Union of Auto Insurers, also found them reasonable and refused creditors in part of their claims in the amount of more than 3 million rubles (the Client’s interests were represented by lawyer’s trainee Oleg Zubkov).
The appeal ruling of the Moscow City Court in case 33-3425/2020 upheld the decision of the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow to recover the debt for payment of the cession agreement in the amount of 4.2 million rubles in favor of a bank-client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Moscow City Court rejected the Defendant’s arguments regarding the application of the provisions of Article 333 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and agreed with the evidence of proportionality of the penalty to the consequences of the violated obligation(the Bank’s interest was represented by trainee lawyer Konstantin Tkachenko).
The Moscow Region Arbitration Court dismissed the claim filed by OJSC “Russian Railways” against the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” due to the fact that the arguments stated in the claim did not match the claim filed and the pre-trial procedure for resolving the dispute was not followed (the interests of Defendant were represented by trainee lawyer Rashid Gitinov).
The Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the court of the first instance to refuse to invalidate the decision of the General meeting of members of the Company, whose interests are represented by MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” (the interests of the Defendant were represented by trainee lawyer Rashid Gitinov).
Guryevsky District Court of the Kaliningrad Region admitted the arguments of our Client’s Bank as justified and foreclosed on the Debtor’s land plot (interests were represented by lawyer Vadim Makarichev).