The cassation\ninstance upheld the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal. Earlier,\nthe carrier was denied a claim to recover the cost of storage of cargo under\nthe contract of carriage in the amount of 25 million rubles. The interests of\nthe Defendant were protected by Nikita Filippov, lawyer, head of MCBA \u201cBureau\nof Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d and lawyer Yulia Martynenko.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Simonovsky\nDistrict Court of Moscow fully refused to satisfy the claim against the\ncompany, the Principal of\nMCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d, to recover a \u201cgolden parachute\u201d worth\nmore than 100 million rubles. The\ninterests of the Principal were defended by lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers\n\u201cDe jure\u201d Jakov Bulut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Ninth\nArbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Moscow Arbitration\nCourt, which satisfied the claim of the Bank – client of “De\njure”. Debt under the loan\nagreement in the amount of more than 6 million rubles is recovered from the Defendant. The\nforeclosure is on the subject of pledge – two herds of cows. At the same time, the court considered the\nfact of destruction (slaughter) of cattle unproven. The penalty is also levied\non the Defendant’s vehicles. The interests of the Bank were represented by\nMarina Nikolayenko, lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The\nArbitration Court of Khabarovsk Krai during the consideration of the approval\nof the current expenses of the insurance company, the Creditor was denied the\nrequest for an expert examination of the cost of services, organizations\ninvolved by the bankruptcy Trustee, including lawyers, accountants and others.\nThe interests of the bankruptcy Trustee were defended by lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau\nof Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d Artemy Litovchenko.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The order of\nthe Arbitration Court of Moscow district upheld the decision of the Arbitration\nCourt of Moscow and the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal to\nrecover from Alfa-insurance JSC the amount of unjust enrichment in the form of\na primary reserve in the amount of 2,000,000 rubles in favor of the insurance\ncompany and interest under Article 395 of the Civil Code of the Russian\nFederation. The interests of the insurance company were represented by lawyer\nof MCBA\n\u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d Ekaterina Rusakova.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The cassation instance upheld the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal. Earlier, the carrier was denied a claim to recover the cost of storage of cargo under the contract of carriage in the amount of 25 million rubles. The interests of the Defendant were protected by Nikita Filippov, lawyer, head of MCBA \u201cBureau…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[163],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32979"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32979"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32980,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32979\/revisions\/32980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}