Lyubertsy\nCity Court of the Moscow Region fully satisfied the Bank’s claims for the\nrecovery of more than 150 thousand rubles from the Debtor\u2019s heir. The interests of the Bank were represented by\nElena Basieva, lawyer of\nMCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The\nArbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassation complaints\nfiled by the Defendants. Earlier, in the\nframework of the bankruptcy case of an individual, the courts of the first and\nsecond instances invalidated the transaction of giving by the Debtor 1\/3 of the\nshare in the apartment to each of his children. The courts also applied the\nconsequences of the invalidity of the transaction in the form of a recovery of\n2.5 million rubles from the sons of the Debtor. (It turned out to be impossible\nto return the apartment in kind, since it was sold to a third party). The court did not accept the argument that\nthe transactions themselves were disputed more than 6 years after the conclusion. The interests of the Lender were represented\nby Rashid Gitinov, lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Moscow Arbitration\nCourt dismissed the claim against the client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d in\nconnection with the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the claim procedure. In\nthe claim, the Buyer demanded to recover from the Defendant overpayment for\nundelivered goods and penalties for delay in the amount of more than 3 million\nrubles. As a result of studying the case materials, it was found that the claim\nwas sent not to the address of the Respondent specified in the USRLE. Moreover,\nthe address indicated in the claim and the address on the postal receipt also\ndid not match. This is that for what Yulia Meshkova, lawyer of “De\njure”, representing the interests of the defendant, drew the attention of\nthe court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Lyubertsy City Court of the Moscow Region fully satisfied the Bank’s claims for the recovery of more than 150 thousand rubles from the Debtor\u2019s heir. The interests of the Bank were represented by Elena Basieva, lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d. The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassation complaints filed…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33246"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33246"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33247,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33246\/revisions\/33247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}