{"id":33367,"date":"2020-09-21T21:42:22","date_gmt":"2020-09-21T18:42:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/?p=33367"},"modified":"2020-11-25T21:53:28","modified_gmt":"2020-11-25T18:53:28","slug":"september-21-main-results-of-the-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/2020\/09\/21\/september-21-main-results-of-the-day\/","title":{"rendered":"September 21.   MAIN RESULTS OF THE DAY"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The appeal\nruling of the Moscow City Court upheld the earlier decision of Presnensky\nDistrict Court of Moscow to satisfy the Bank&#8217;s claim to recover debt under a\nloan agreement in the amount of more than USD 200,000, as well as foreclosure\non a land plot.&nbsp; The interests of the\nBank in the courts of the first and appeal instances were represented by\nKonstantin Glushkov, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District\noverturned the judicial acts of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region and\nthe Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal, which collected interest on a commercial\nloan and a penalty under the supply agreement in the total amount of 4.4\nmillion rubles from the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d with\nreference to non-fulfillment of the settlement agreement approved by the\nArbitration Court of the Moscow Region on a previously considered court\ncase.&nbsp; The interests of the Principal\nwere represented by Rashid Gitinov, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers\n\u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Ninth\nArbitration Court of Appeal satisfied the appeal of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau\nof Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d, canceled the previously adopted ruling of the Arbitration\nCourt of Moscow and refused to include the creditor affiliated with the debtor\nin the register of creditors&#8217; claims over 100 million rubles.&nbsp; The interests of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau\nof Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d were represented by Taisiya Radchenko, lawyer of\nMCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The appeal ruling of the Moscow City Court upheld the earlier decision of Presnensky District Court of Moscow to satisfy the Bank&#8217;s claim to recover debt under a loan agreement in the amount of more than USD 200,000, as well as foreclosure on a land plot.&nbsp; The interests of the Bank in the courts of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33367"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33367"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33367\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33368,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33367\/revisions\/33368"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}