The Moscow\nArbitration Court satisfied the claim of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers\n\u201cDe Jure\u201d and recovered from his procedural opponent a debt of about 1.4\nmillion rubles. Also, the Moscow\nArbitration Court, within the framework of simplified proceedings, satisfied 3\nclaims of the same Client for debt recovery for a total amount of approximately\n1.1 million rubles. The interests of the\nClient are represented by Yakov Bulut\nand Ramzan Mezhidov, attorney and lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Second\nGeneral Jurisdiction Court of Cassation dismissed the Plaintiffs’ cassation\nappeal. Earlier, at first,\nZamoskvoretsky District Court of Moscow dismissed the Plaintiffs in a claim\nagainst the Client of MCBA\n\u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d for the protection of consumer rights,\ninvalidation of the clauses of the contract, the recovery of funds,\ncompensation for moral damage, a fine, and then the Moscow City Court upheld this\ndecision. The client’s interests were\ndefended by Rashid Gitinov, lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Moscow\nArbitration Court satisfied the application of the bankruptcy Trustee of the\nDebtor and declared invalid transactions of transferring bonuses to the former\nchief accountant of the Debtor in the amount of 10 million rubles. The consequences of challenging the\ntransaction were applied in the form of collecting the specified amount from\nthe Defendant. In the course of the trial, the lawyers of MCBA \u201cBureau of\nLawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d, acting as representatives of the Debtor’s creditor, managed\nto prove that the chief accountant not only had no right to the bonuses, but\nsimply ruined the company’s financial year. \nThe arbitration court agreed with this conclusion of the Creditor and\ndeclared the transaction invalid. The\ninterests of the Creditor were represented by Andrey Khokhlov, lawyer of MCBA\n\u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Moscow Arbitration Court satisfied the claim of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe Jure\u201d and recovered from his procedural opponent a debt of about 1.4 million rubles. Also, the Moscow Arbitration Court, within the framework of simplified proceedings, satisfied 3 claims of the same Client for debt recovery for a total amount…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33383"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33383"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33384,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33383\/revisions\/33384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}