{"id":33411,"date":"2020-11-19T11:18:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-19T08:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/?p=33411"},"modified":"2020-12-30T11:19:08","modified_gmt":"2020-12-30T08:19:08","slug":"november-19-main-results-of-the-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/2020\/11\/19\/november-19-main-results-of-the-day\/","title":{"rendered":"November 19      Main results of the day"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The First\nGeneral Jurisdiction Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Moscow City\nCourt, which earlier, at the request of the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau\nof Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d, partially invalidated the Resolution of the Moscow\nGovernment dated November 28, 2014 Number 700-PP \u201cOn Determining the List of\nReal Estate Objects&nbsp; whose tax base is\ndetermined as their cadastral value\u201d (the property of the Principal of the Bureau\nis excluded from the list), which entails a revision of the tax burden and the\nreturn to the Principal of previously paid tax payments in the amount of more\nthan 3.5 million rubles. The interests of the Principal of the Bureau were\nrepresented by senior lawyer Rashid Gitinov.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zamoskvoretsky\nDistrict Court of Moscow rejected in full the Plaintiff\u2019s a claim for over 900\nthousand rubles filed against an educational organization whose interests are\nbeing defended by MCBA\n\u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.&nbsp; The court\nagreed with the legal position of the Defendant that the Plaintiff had no right\nto a refund in accordance with the terms of the contract.&nbsp; The interests of the educational organization\nwere represented by Ilsur Zakirov,&nbsp;\nlawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The First General Jurisdiction Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Moscow City Court, which earlier, at the request of the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d, partially invalidated the Resolution of the Moscow Government dated November 28, 2014 Number 700-PP \u201cOn Determining the List of Real Estate Objects&nbsp; whose tax base&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33411"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33411"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33411\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33412,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33411\/revisions\/33412"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}