{"id":33413,"date":"2020-11-23T11:19:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-23T08:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/?p=33413"},"modified":"2020-12-30T11:20:01","modified_gmt":"2020-12-30T08:20:01","slug":"november-23-main-results-of-the-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/2020\/11\/23\/november-23-main-results-of-the-day\/","title":{"rendered":"November 23      Main results of the day"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The\nArbitration Court of the Moscow District left unchanged the earlier adopted\njudicial acts of lower courts on the refusal to include in the register of\nclaims of the Bank&#8217;s creditors demands in the amount of $ 1 million dollars based\non a bill of exchange obligation. The court agreed with the arguments of MCBA\n\u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d that the presentation of the bill is not an unconditional\nbasis for inclusion in the in the register, other circumstances are also\nsubject to verification\nincluding the economic feasibility of the transaction, factors of\nissuing the bill.&nbsp; The interests of the\nBank were defended by Marina Nikolaenko, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of\nLawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Moscow\nArbitration Court denied the Moscow Government and the Moscow City Property\nDepartment in satisfying the claim against the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau of\nLawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d for the demolition of the extension and recognition\nof the property right to the extension as missing. The interests of the Principal were\nrepresented by Rashid Gitinov, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe\njure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the\nresults of the online meeting, the Sixteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal satisfied the\ncomplaint of the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d against the\ndecision to refuse to cancel the interim measures. As a result, the appellate\ncourt canceled the interim measures in the form of the seizure of funds in the\namount of almost 90 million rubles.&nbsp; The\ninterests of the Principal were represented by lawyer Yakov Bulut.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District left unchanged the earlier adopted judicial acts of lower courts on the refusal to include in the register of claims of the Bank&#8217;s creditors demands in the amount of $ 1 million dollars based on a bill of exchange obligation. The court agreed with the arguments of MCBA&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33413"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33413"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33413\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33414,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33413\/revisions\/33414"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}