{"id":33435,"date":"2020-12-21T12:35:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-21T09:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/?p=33435"},"modified":"2021-10-07T23:19:12","modified_gmt":"2021-10-07T20:19:12","slug":"december-21-main-results-of-the-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/2020\/12\/21\/december-21-main-results-of-the-day\/","title":{"rendered":"December 21      Main results of the day"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Moscow\nArbitration Court partially satisfied the claims of the Principal of MCBA\n\u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d for the recovery of 150 thousand rubles from the Debtor.\nPartial satisfaction is associated with a reduction of penalty interest and\ncourt costs by the court. The interests of the Principal were represented by\nRashid Gitinov, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Preobrazhensky\nDistrict Court of Moscow satisfied the claim of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of\nLawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d and recovered from the Defendant 54 thousand Euros of the\nprincipal debt, 1 million rubles of interest, as well as legal costs.&nbsp; In the course of the litigation, a forensic\nexamination was carried out in order to determine the limitation period of the\ncontract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, which fully confirmed the\narguments of the Client of the Bureau.&nbsp;\nThe court also refused to order a second examination for the Defendant.&nbsp; The Client was represented by Marina\nNikolaenko, senior lawyer\nof the Bureau.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Ninth\nArbitration Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the court of the first\ninstance and fully refused the Plaintiff to satisfy his claim to collect from\nthe Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d a fee for excess use of\ncontainers in the amount of over 50 million rubles.&nbsp; The Client was represented by Nikita\nFilippov, Head of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Moscow Arbitration Court partially satisfied the claims of the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d for the recovery of 150 thousand rubles from the Debtor. Partial satisfaction is associated with a reduction of penalty interest and court costs by the court. The interests of the Principal were represented by Rashid Gitinov, senior&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[163],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33435"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33435"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33436,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33435\/revisions\/33436"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}