{"id":33512,"date":"2021-03-17T04:32:18","date_gmt":"2021-03-17T01:32:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/?p=33512"},"modified":"2021-10-07T23:19:12","modified_gmt":"2021-10-07T20:19:12","slug":"mcba-bureau-of-lawyers-de-jure-again-proved-that-it-is-one-of-the-best-teams-of-the-law-market-in-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/2021\/03\/17\/mcba-bureau-of-lawyers-de-jure-again-proved-that-it-is-one-of-the-best-teams-of-the-law-market-in-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d again proved that it is one of the best teams of the law market in Russia."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This time, the high professionalism of the Bureau is confirmed by the newspaper &#8220;Kommersant&#8221;, which noted the results of the Bureau in 24 categories!<\/p>\n<p>MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d is among the best legal teams in the following categories:<\/p>\n<p>DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION: DISPUTES FROM PROPERTY RELATIONS (FEDERAL RATING) &#8211; 2ND PLACE<\/p>\n<p>ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: COMMERCIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION: MID-MARKET (FEDERAL RATING) &#8211; 6TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>FINANCIAL AND BANKING SECTOR: RESOLUTION OF KEY DISPUTES IN BANKING, INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE SERVICES INDUSTRIES \u2013 5TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>BANKRUPTCY OF CREDIT INSTITUTIONS \u2013 2ND PLACE<\/p>\n<p>BANKRUPTCY OF LEGAL ENTITIES (FEDERAL RATING) \u2013 4TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>BANKRUPTCY OF INDIVIDUALS (FEDERAL RATING) \u2013 7TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>INSURANCE LAW \u2013 4TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>PRIVATE CAPITAL \u2013 10TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE: DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF REAL ESTATE MARKET PARTICIPANTS (FEDERAL RATING) &#8211; 10TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: RESOLUTION OF MAIN DISPUTES IN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRIES &#8211; 9TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>DISPUTES ON DIVORCE, DIVISION OF PROPERTY AND INHERITED ASSETS (FEDERAL RATING) &#8211; 9TH PLACE<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Also, MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d was included in the TOP-15 Russian law firms in the following categories:<\/p>\n<p>ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: COMMERCIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION: HIGH-END (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: CORPORATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: HIGH-END (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS: RESOLUTION OF MAIN DISPUTES IN INDUSTRY<\/p>\n<p>TAX LAW: DISPUTE RESOLUTION WITH FEDERAL TAX SERVICE (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>FAMILY AND INHERITANCE LAW: STRUCTURING INHERITED ASSETS (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>LABOR AND MIGRATION LAW: DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE FIELD OF LABOR AND MIGRATION LEGISLATION (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>CRIMINAL LAW: ECONOMIC CRIMES (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>CRIMINAL LAW: OFFICIAL CRIMES (FEDERAL RATING)<\/p>\n<p>Among other victories, MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d took the 2nd place in the category &#8220;LABOR AND MIGRATION LAW: CONSULTING ON LABOR AND MIGRATION LEGISLATION (FEDERAL RATING: BAND 2)<\/p>\n<p>In addition, Kommersant noted in the Individual rating of lawyers Nikita Filippov, Head of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d, in the nomination &#8220;BANKRUPTCY (FEDERAL RATING)&#8221;, Valentina Petrova in the nominations &#8220;DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION (FEDERAL RATING)&#8221; and &#8220;FAMILY AND INHERITANCE LAW (FEDERAL RATING)&#8221;, as well as Alexander Pogodin in the nomination &#8220;CRIMINAL LAW&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d congratulates all employees with brilliant results this year!\u00a0 This deserved victory is the result of the work of everyone in our cohesive team!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><script src=\"chrome-extension:\/\/hhojmcideegachlhfgfdhailpfhgknjm\/web_accessible_resources\/index.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This time, the high professionalism of the Bureau is confirmed by the newspaper &#8220;Kommersant&#8221;, which noted the results of the Bureau in 24 categories! MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d is among the best legal teams in the following categories: DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION: DISPUTES FROM PROPERTY RELATIONS (FEDERAL RATING) &#8211; 2ND&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[163],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33512"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33512"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33512\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33513,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33512\/revisions\/33513"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}