{"id":33687,"date":"2021-09-02T23:29:02","date_gmt":"2021-09-02T20:29:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/?p=33687"},"modified":"2021-10-07T23:29:57","modified_gmt":"2021-10-07T20:29:57","slug":"september-2-main-results-of-the-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/2021\/09\/02\/september-2-main-results-of-the-day\/","title":{"rendered":"September 2    Main results of the day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Moscow Arbitration Court satisfied the claims of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d and recovered from the Defendant a debt in the amount of 1.2 million rubles, as well as interest on a commercial loan on of the date of actual fulfillment of the monetary obligation. The Client was represented by Yakov Prisyazhnyuk, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The Moscow City Court refused to satisfy the appeal of the procedural opponent of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d, having recognized the reasoned arguments of the Bureau about the absence of grounds for collecting losses in the amount of more than 30 million rubles from the Principal of the Bureau. The interests of the Principal were defended by Rashid Gitinov, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The Cheremushkinsky District Court of Moscow agreed with the legal position of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d that there were no grounds for recognizing the apartment as joint property of the former spouses and dismissed the claim for the division of the apartment filed against the Bureau&#8217;s client. The Client&#8217;s interests were defended by Sergey Bibikov, senior lawyer of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Moscow Arbitration Court satisfied the claims of the Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers \u201cDe jure\u201d and recovered from the Defendant a debt in the amount of 1.2 million rubles, as well as interest on a commercial loan on of the date of actual fulfillment of the monetary obligation. The Client was represented by&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[172,160,171],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33687"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33687"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33688,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33687\/revisions\/33688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}