The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal refused to the procedural opponents of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d to cancel the decision of the court of first instance on a corporate dispute involving a Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d. Earlier, the court of first instance satisfied the Client’s claims and obliged the company, of which the Client is a member, to provide documents about this company. Also, in case of non-execution of a judicial act, the decision provides for a court penalty in the amount of 10 thousand rubles for each day of non-execution of the court decision. The preparation of the legal position and the interests of the Client were represented by Marina Nikolaenko, head of practice of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d, and Nikolay Polusitov, senior lawyer of the Bureau.<\/p>\n
The Golovinsky District Court of Moscow satisfied the requirement of the Principal of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d to cancel the record of the civil status act on paternity. The interests of the Principal were represented by Marina Nikolaenko, head of the practice of resolving family and inheritance disputes.<\/p>\n
The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal refused the procedural opponents of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d to satisfy the complaint against the ruling of the court of first instance on leaving the claim against the Client of the Bureau without consideration. MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d proved the fact of non-compliance by the Plaintiff with the pre-trial procedure for considering the dispute. The interests of the Client were represented by Yakov Prisyazhnyuk, senior lawyer of the practice of resolving economic disputes of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal refused to the procedural opponents of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d to cancel the decision of the court of first instance on a corporate dispute involving a Client of MCBA \u201cBureau of Lawyers “De jure\u201d. Earlier, the court of first instance satisfied the Client’s claims and obliged the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[167,171],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33803"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33803"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33804,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33803\/revisions\/33804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/de-ure.ru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}