The Second Cassation Court of General jurisdiction upheld the acts of lower courts, according to which more than 12 million rubles of debt under the loan agreement were recovered from the Borrower. The Defendant’s argument about improper notification him of trial in the court of the first instance was rejected. The Bank’s interests were represented by Alexander Uchaykin, lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Appeal instance upheld the decision previously taken on the application of the Creditor to introduce a procedure for the sale of property in respect of the Debtor. The interests of the Creditor were represented by Taisiya Radchenko, lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.