November 23 Main results of the day

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District left unchanged the earlier adopted judicial acts of lower courts on the refusal to include in the register of claims of the Bank’s creditors demands in the amount of $ 1 million dollars based on a bill of exchange obligation. The court agreed with the arguments of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” that the presentation of the bill is not an unconditional basis for inclusion in the in the register, other circumstances are also subject to verification including the economic feasibility of the transaction, factors of issuing the bill.  The interests of the Bank were defended by Marina Nikolaenko, senior lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Moscow Arbitration Court denied the Moscow Government and the Moscow City Property Department in satisfying the claim against the Principal of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” for the demolition of the extension and recognition of the property right to the extension as missing. The interests of the Principal were represented by Rashid Gitinov, senior lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

Based on the results of the online meeting, the Sixteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal satisfied the complaint of the Principal of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” against the decision to refuse to cancel the interim measures. As a result, the appellate court canceled the interim measures in the form of the seizure of funds in the amount of almost 90 million rubles.  The interests of the Principal were represented by lawyer Yakov Bulut.