March 22 Main results of the day

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal satisfied the appeal of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” and canceled the illegal ruling of the court of first instance on the completion of the bankruptcy procedure. Previously, the court of first instance refused to the Client of the Bureau in the application of the rules of paragraph 4 of Chapter X of Bankruptcy Law, completed the procedure for selling the citizen’s property and released the debtor from fulfilling his obligations to creditors. The Court of Appeal agreed with the arguments of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” that the deadline for the opening of the inheritance did not expire, which means that the completion of the bankruptcy procedure and the refusal to apply Paragraph 4 of Chapters X of the Bankruptcy Law is premature and violates the rights of bankruptcy creditors. New evidence arising after the consideration of the case in the court of the first instance was also attached to the case materials, – a letter from a notary about the opening of hereditary case and the heirs’ request for a certificate of inheritance rights, which testified about the presence of Debtor’s property. The Client’s interests were represented by Taisiya Radchenko, Senior Lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District refused to satisfy the cassation complaint of the procedural opponents of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.  Previously, the Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal canceled the decision of the court of first instance and refused to satisfy the claim filed against the Principal of the Bureau to recover the debt in the amount of more than 3 million rubles.  In court of cassation instance, the interests of the Principle were represented by Denis Amelchenko, lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.