June 17 Main results of the day

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dismissed the complaint of the Bureau’s procedural opponents against the decision of the court of the first instance to refuse to correct the typo. Within the framework of this case, the Client of the Bureau claimed to recover the debt in the amount of 73 million rubles from the Defendant. During the court dispute, the Moscow Arbitration Court, postponing the trial, indicated that the Defendant did not agree with the stated requirements. It was this phrase that the Defendant tried to challenge, since in this case he could count on an unreasonable transfer of the case to the arbitration court. The appellate court agreed with the legal position of the Bureau that since the Defendant did not declare recognition of the claim, he did not agree with this requirement. As a result, the complaint was denied. The Client’s interests were represented by Polina Arkannikova, senior lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.