October 26 Main results of the day

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District recognized the legal position of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” as justified, canceled the judicial acts of the courts of first and appellate instances regarding the refusal to satisfy the initial claim and sent the case in this part for a new examination. Regarding the refusal to satisfy the counterclaim, the decisions of the courts were left unchanged. Within the framework of this dispute, the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” filed a claim for recovery of more than 50 million rubles from the debtor under the contract for the supply of petroleum products (compensation due to a decrease in the volume of previously ordered goods), the Defendant filed a counterclaim to change the terms of the contract judicially. The courts refused to satisfy both the initial and counter claims. In the court of cassation instance, MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” was able to prove that the adopted judicial acts on the refusal to recover compensation violate the uniformity of judicial practice. The interests of the Client were represented by Yakov Bulut, lawyer, head of the practice of resolving economic disputes of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.