December 9 Main results of the day

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District refused to satisfy the cassation appeal of the procedural opponents of the company, whose interests were defended by lawyers of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. Earlier, in the court of appeal, the lawyers of the Bureau achieved the cancellation of the decision of the Arbitration Court of Moscow, which collected 3.5 million rubles from our client as a lost profit for the downtime of the premises, which, according to the other party, was flooded by the Principal of the Bureau. In order to protect the client, the Bureau refuted the reliability of the opponents’ evidence (assessment report, contract with realtors, etc.), and also selected relevant judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on similar disputes. Thus, the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal, which was positive for our client, remained in force. The Client’s interests were represented by Yakov Bulut, lawyer, head of the practice of resolving economic disputes of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the first instance court, which satisfied the claim of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” on the obligation to provide documents on the company’s activities. Abusing their rights, opponents in the dispute tried to postpone the moment when the court decision came into legal force, filed unreasonable petitions, and filed additional complaints on the day of the court session. Despite all the actions of the opponents, the lawyers of the Bureau managed to prove to the court the illegality of the applicants’ claims on the appeal. The interests of the Client were represented by Marina Nikolaenko, head of the practice of resolving family and inheritance disputes of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.