The Nikulinsky district Court of Moscow refused to satisfy the claim for the division of the spouses’ property aimed at transferring the property of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” in favor of the procedural opponent and collecting from the Client funds allegedly spent by the spouse during the marriage not in the interests of the family. The property to be transferred included several real estate objects, including a house in Spain, 60 percent of the company’s share, several cars. The total amount of claims for the lawsuit amounted to 2.5 billion rubles. The counterclaims of the Client of the Bureau are fully satisfied! The lawyers of the Bureau proved to the court the position on the necessity of dividing real estate objects and cars according to the established order of use, leaving a share in the company to the Client of the Bureau, who is directly involved in business and has an interest in it. In addition, the Lawyers of the Bureau presented evidence that made it possible to reduce the amount of recovery from our Client, taking into account the offset of the value of all transferred property to the parties, to the amount of slightly more than 7 million rubles that were in bank accounts on the date of termination of the common economy. The Client’s interests were represented by Nikita Filippov, lawyer, head of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, and Tatiana Bogomolova, lawyer of the Bureau.
The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled to refuse to satisfy the claims of the procedural opponent of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” to terminate the loan agreement due to a significant change in circumstances. The lawyers of the Bureau proved to the court that the early reclamation of the loan amount does not entail the termination of full fulfillment of obligations. The Client was represented by Sergey Bibikov, senior lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.