December 22 Main results of the day

The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow refused to satisfy the applicant’s claims to recognize the actions of the Notary as illegal. As part of this dispute, the Notary accepted funds from the debtor’s bankruptcy creditor on his deposit to pay off the Debtor’s claims against the applicant in the framework of the bankruptcy case. The Court agreed with the legal position of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” that when accepting funds for deposit, the Notary is based on the arguments of the creditor’s application and does not conduct a legal examination of material legal relations, including does not study the bankrupt grounds of the existing dispute between the debtor’s creditors. During the trial, it was established that there were no violations on the part of the Notary, and it was also established that the dispute about challenging the notarial act was based on a conflict between two bankruptcy creditors of the debtor, the assessment of which is carried out within the framework of another dispute. The interests of the Notary were represented by Sergei Bibikov, senior lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.