March 22 Main results of the day

The Leninsky District Court of Tyumen city approved a settlement agreement in the case of the division of the spouses’ property in the wording satisfying the requirements of the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” and prepared by the lawyers of the Bureau. The main purpose of the settlement agreement – the preservation of the key object of real estate in the ownership of the Principal – was achieved thanks to carefully collected evidence and a correctly constructed legal position in the case. Regarding the requirements for the establishment of alimony obligations, the court also sided with the Plaintiff and satisfied the claims in the amount claimed. The interests of the Principal were represented by Ivan Bychkov, lawyer, head of the Tyumen branch of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal refused to satisfy the borrower’s appeal against the decision of the court of first instance. As part of this dispute, the Moscow Arbitration Court refused the borrower to terminate the loan agreement with the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. The Court agreed with the Bureau’s arguments that there was no significant change in circumstances due to the spread of Covid-19 that would allow the borrower to terminate the contract in court. The financial obligations of the borrower to the Principal of the Bureau in the amount of 20 million rubles are preserved. The interests of the Principal were represented by Sergey Bibikov, senior dispute lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal, having considered the appeal of our procedural opponents, upheld the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region, which was positive for the Client of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. According to the decision, the shareholder of the company was denied the claim for the recovery of losses in the amount of more than 52 million rubles from our Client allegedly caused by him in connection with the management of the company as General Director. Lawyers of the Bureau managed to prove that the transaction concluded by our Client did not cause losses to the company, but, on the contrary, was economically justified, and the requirements of the shareholder are not aimed at protecting the company, but only at the abuse of the right and an attempt to get unreasonably rich. The Client’s interests were represented by Yakov Bulut, head of the practice of resolving economic disputes of the Bureau of Lawyers “De Jure”.