April 21 Main results of the day

The Supreme Court agreed with the legal position of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, canceled the judicial acts of the appellate and cassation instances adopted in the case and invalidated the transaction for the sale of the land plot by the debtor of the Principal of the Bureau. Lawyers of the Bureau managed to prove both the inequivalence of the counter obligation under the contract and its actual non-fulfillment, despite the documents confirming the fulfillment. The Principal’s interests were represented by Nikita Filippov, Head of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Krasnodar Regional Court granted the appeal of the Client of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, as a result of which the judicial act of the Lazarevsky District Court of Sochi on the claim for recognition of the fact of acceptance of inheritance and recognition of ownership of real estate was canceled. The Court of Appeal issued a new judicial act, which dismissed the claims of the Plaintiff against the Principal of the Bureau in full. The Court of Appeal agreed with the position of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” that the actual acceptance of the inheritance is allowed only in relation to the property that belonged to the deceased at the time of death. The court also established that the registration of ownership of the Principal (and subsequently of a third party) took place legally; the validity of transactions was confirmed by judicial acts. The interests of the Principal were represented by Marina Nikolaenko, Head of the Family and Inheritance Dispute Resolution Practice at the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Arbitration Court of the Stavropol Territory refused the creditor, a friendly debtor, to include his claim in the amount of 1.8 million rubles in the register of claims of the debtor’s creditors. The debtor, trying to take control of his bankruptcy, did not object to the satisfaction of the creditor’s claims of a friendly creditor. But the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to prove to the court their groundlessness and the true purpose, which does not protect the violated right of the creditor, but is an abuse of law. The Client’s interests were represented by Roman Volkomorov, lawyer of the Tyumen branch of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.