September 29 Main results of the day

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal refused to satisfy the appeal of the opponents of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” against the decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court, which satisfied the requirement for the settlement of disagreements that arose when concluding a contract of sale of non-residential premises between a public authority and a legal entity whose interests were represented by Semyon Garayan, lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, as well as the requirement to invalidate the decision to refuse to provide a public service. During the consideration of the dispute in the court of appeal, a procedural position was successfully substantiated, which refuted all the remarks of the public authority to the expert’s opinion, since, as part of the consideration of the dispute in the court of first instance, exhaustive answers were given to each objection of the opponents. Moreover, the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to convince the court that there was a violation on the part of the public authority in the provision of public services. The interests of the Principal were represented by Semyon Garayan, lawyer from the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.