The recovery of losses from the Principal in the amount of more than 20 million rubles was refused, the decision entered into force. The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the lower court to refuse to recover damages from the Principal. The legal dispute lasted for almost 3 years, at the first round of consideration the decision was in favor of the procedural opponents of the Principal, but later it was canceled by the court of cassation. In a new trial, lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” were able to prove to the court the nullity of the agreements on the basis of which the damages are recovered, as well as the substantial dishonesty of the Plaintiff. The Principal’s interests were represented by Nikita Filippov, Head of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, the procedural position was prepared by Nikolay Polusitov, senior lawyer.
The Krasnogorsk City Court of the Moscow Region satisfied the Principal’s application for the issuance of a duplicate writ of execution in the 2018 case, which was lost by the court itself. After a few postponements, lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to convince the court that in case of loss of the writ of execution by the court that issued it, the Principal has the right to apply to the court with an application for the issuance of a duplicate writ of execution, and not just with an application for the issuance of a writ of execution, since in the latter case a situation may arise when two relevant executive documents have been issued in the case. The interests of the Principal were represented by Ekaterina Bulygina, senior lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.