June 29 Main results of the day

The Krasnogorsk City Court of the Moscow Region refused to satisfy the opponents’ claim for the establishment of a debt and a unilateral change in the terms of the agreement on the payment of alimony. The court also satisfied the counterclaim of our Principal for the termination of the agreement on the payment of alimony and the recovery of alimony for all children, including those not from the Plaintiff, in the legal amount. During the consideration of the case, the lawyer of the Bureau managed to convince the court that the Defendant paid alimony on time and in the amount established by the agreement, and therefore he has no debt under the agreement. When substantiating its position on the counterclaim, the Bureau managed to convince the court not only that the financial and marital status of the alimony payer has changed so much that it does not allow him to make payments in the same amount, but also that the conclusion of an agreement on the payment of alimony does not give the Plaintiff any preferences that allow him to receive alimony in a share of income in a larger amount than the Defendant’s children from other marriages will receive. The interests of the Principal in court were represented by Nikita Filippov, lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.