August 10 Main results of the day

The Second Court of Cassation upheld the decision, which recovered funds in the amount of more than 3 million rubles from the Defendant in favor of the Principal. As part of the dispute, the Defendant pointed to the absence of a loan agreement, its interest-free nature and the omission of the limitation period. But the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” skillfully refuted all the arguments of the opponent. They drew the court’s attention to the fact that the conclusion of the contract took place by exchanging signed scans of the contract between the parties. And the fact that the Defendant transferred 40 thousand rubles more than the usual loan payment indicates partial payment of interest to them and recognition of the interest- bearing nature of the loan. The limitation period for periodic payments has not been missed, since in the absence of another purpose in payment orders, the Principal has the right to direct incoming funds for repayment according to the schedule of the first payments. The interests of the Principal were represented by Ilsur Zakirov, Senior Lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.