The Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region granted an application to challenge the debtor’s transaction in the amount of 21.5 million rubles, protecting the interests of the Principal acting as a creditor. During the pre-bankruptcy period, the debtor transferred funds received from the Principal creditor to an affiliated person. In turn, the affiliate purchased apartments with the disputed funds. These circumstances made the case difficult, since it was necessary not only to prove the illegality of the transfer, but also to return the acquired property to the bankruptcy estate. Having proved that the procedural opponents used the “imaginary owner” construction, the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” were able to achieve all their goals and convinced the court of the validity of returning the premises to the debtor. The interests of the Principal were represented by Ksenia Stikhina, senior lawyer of the Tyumen branch of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Moscow Arbitration Court dismissed the claim of a homeowners’ association against the owner of non-residential premises to restore the premises to their original form. The Principal is the owner of non-residential premises in an apartment building and, in agreement with the competent authorities, has redeveloped them in order to use them in a more efficient way. However, the partnership considered that as a result of the redevelopment, common property was affected and filed a corresponding claim in court. Both sides had plenty of arguments for and against. Nevertheless, the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to convince the court of the insolvency of the opponents’ position and tip the scales in favor of the Principal. His interests were represented by Alexander Uchaykin, Senior lawyer in the practice of resolving economic disputes at the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.