The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement between the Principal (a leading Russian engineering and construction center) and an IT company in the amount of 2 million rubles, which subsequently filed claims against the Principal of the Bureau for debt collection under the Agreement for the provision of communication services at the construction site. Bureau employees managed to convince the court and the opponent of the legality and benefit of the terms of the settlement agreement. The interests of the Principal were represented by Dan Khorolets, lawyer of the practice of resolving economic disputes of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Moscow Regional Court left without consideration on the merits the opponent’s complaint against the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, a large entrepreneur in the field of transport services. The court found convincing the arguments of Rashid Gitinov, head of the practice of disputes with government agencies, that the appellant did not have the right to file a complaint due to the lack of proof of the status of the bankruptcy creditor and his affiliation with the Defendant who is in bankruptcy proceedings, whose concerted actions are aimed solely at the abuse of procedural law, with the aim of evading the Defendant from execution of the court decision and the obligation to repay a loan in the amount of more than 600 million rubles.