The Moscow Arbitration Court recognized the Principal’s claims in the amount of 5.9 million rubles as justified and included them in the register of claims of the debtor’s creditors as secured by a pledge of property.
The dispute was complicated by the fact that the debtor objected to the collateral status by providing information about the retirement of collateral goods in circulation. At the same time, the lawyers of the MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” refuted the pledgor’s arguments, pointing out that the opponent did not provide acceptable and sufficient grounds for refusing to satisfy the stated requirements, and the disposal of goods from the jurisdiction does not mean that the debtor has no other property that meets the characteristics of the subject of pledge.
The interests of the Principal were represented by Ksenia Stikhina and Sergey Bibikov, senior lawyers of the “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.