The Cassation Court rejected the appeal of the Moscow Government and the Department of City Property in the case on the claim against the Principal for the demolition of a building with an area of more than 1.9 thousand square meters. In support of the complaint, government agencies referred to the fact that the land under the building was not provided for construction purposes and the building itself was erected without any documentation.
During the dispute, Rashid Gitinov, Head of the practice of resolving disputes with government agencies, managed to defend his position in three court instances that the building was constructed in full compliance with the legislation in force during the construction period of the facility, presenting convincing evidence of this obtained from the Main Archives Department of Moscow.
Rashid also proved the fact that the limitation period had expired, which, taking into account the results of the forensic examination of the absence of a threat to the life and health of citizens, is an independent basis for rejecting the claim.
As a result of the dispute, the courts recognized the demands and complaints made by state bodies as unfounded and rejected them in full.