November 21 Main results of the day

And the money from all over the world is not enough…

The Principal is the owner of a land plot in Moscow, access to which is possible only through a neighboring section of a state institution.

In this situation, the only option was an easement – the right of limited use for travel and passage to one’s own plot through the plot of another person. The client has repeatedly contacted the institution and offered all possible settlement options, including monetary compensation, reconstruction of the area, and improvement of both plots at his own expense.

However, in response, he received a categorical refusal, which became the reason for his contacting us and subsequently filing a lawsuit with the court for the compulsory establishment of an easement.

In the court case, the institution (the famous Russian theater) continued to seek a refusal to establish an absolutely legitimate easement of our client. Both the Ministry of Culture and the Federal Property Management Agency objected to the satisfaction of the claim. As part of a lengthy two-year trial in the first instance, several forensic examinations were conducted. According to the results of the initial examination, various access options were identified, however, the issue of laying communications within the nature conservation area required additional research. The re-examination, having conducted an extended study, confirmed the validity of the client’s requirements for the establishment of an easement through the institution’s land.

Having consistently refuted all the objections of the institution, accompanying each of the examinations, our lawyers managed to satisfy the claims in full and establish an easement on our terms.

The opponents were buried within the boundaries of the land plot, along with their hopes – Konstantin E. Tkachenko, lawyer, Head of the practice of legal support for entrepreneurship, and Grigory G. Mirovsky, senior associate.