The second court of cassation of general jurisdiction canceled the decision of the appellate instance and sent the case of a Bank – a client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” – to a new trial. The cassation instance found convincing the arguments of our Principal that the court unlawfully reduced the amount of the penalty stipulated by Article 333 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, below the lower limit established by paragraph 6 of Article 395 of the Civil Code. The Bank’s interests were represented by lawyer Konstantin Glushkov.
In addition, Moscow Arbitration Court included three claims of Creditors – clients of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” – in the register of claims for a total amount of more than 150 million rubles. It is noteworthy that one of these claims was based on a requirement arising from the section of general obligations of the spouses. Another claim of the Client was satisfied as secured by a pledge of real estate, even in the absence of information about the pledge in the USRN.
The interests of Clients were represented by lawyers Vadim Makarichev and Yakov Bulut, as well as lawyer Andrei Khokhlov