April 14 Main results of the day

The Moscow City Court partially overturned the decision of the court of first instance in the case in which the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” was a third party who did not make independent claims on the subject of the dispute. At the same time, it was important for the Client to defend the position on the Defendant’s failure to fulfill his obligations of managing the apartment building, the absence of a causal relationship between the repairs carried out in the Client’s apartment and the flooding of the apartment located on the floor below. This goal was fully achieved. The interests of the Client were represented by lawyer of the Bureau Polina Arkannikova.

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the Defendant’s complaint against the ruling of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal, which collected more than 50 million rubles in favor of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” under a contract on the organization of the carriage of goods. The interests of the Client were represented by Nikita Filippov, Head of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, and Yulia Martynenko, lawyer of the Bureau.

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal satisfied the complaint of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, canceled the previously adopted judicial act and refused the procedural opponent of the Bureau to include the claims for the total amount of more than 7 million rubles to the register of creditors’ claims. The interests of the Client of the Bureau were represented by lawyer Viktor Pokormyak, the legal position on the case was prepared by Aleksandra Reznichenko, Senior Lawyer of the Bureau.

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region recognized the legal position of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” as justified and refused to include the Creditor in the register of creditors’ claims. The Client’s interests in the bankruptcy case were represented by Taisiya Radchenko, Senior Lawyer of the Bureau.