November 24 Main results of the day

The Perovskiy District Court of Moscow, having considered the claim of the Department of State Property of Moscow against the Principal of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, as well as the counterclaim of the Principal, rejected the Department’s claims in full and satisfied the counterclaim for recognizing the ownership of the apartment. The Department based its claims on the fact that the disputed apartment is an escheat property, but the lawyer of the Bureau, Andrey Makarov, managed to prove the groundlessness of this position, as well as the fact that the Principal actually accepted the inheritance by taking possession of the property, taking measures to preserve it and maintaining it in habitable condition. In addition, the court established the facts of improper notarial actions committed by a number of notaries against the Principal, which led to the omission of the deadline for accepting the inheritance. In this regard, the court found the lawyer’s arguments as reasonable and satisfied the Principal’s counterclaim in full. The interests of the Client were represented by Andrey Makarov, lawyer of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Moscow Regional Court upheld the decision of the Odintsovo City Court, which previously satisfied the Client’s claim for determining the child’s place of residence with the father. In such disputes, it is quite rare that the courts leave the child with the father, and not with the mother. But within the framework of this case, MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” was able to provide sufficient evidence confirming that only by living with the father all the necessary needs of the child will be provided. The interests of the Client were represented by Vladimir Leonov, senior lawyer of the practice of resolving family and inheritance disputes of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.