January 14 Main results of the day

The Moscow Arbitration Court has refused to satisfy the claim of the Moscow City Property Department for the recovery of 25 million rubles, brought against the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. The Department, in support of the claim, referred to the Client’s non-payment of rent for non-residential premise. But the court, rejecting the claim, agreed with the position of the Bureau that the recovery of the disputed debt would lead to unjustified enrichment of the Department, which had previously unreasonably refused to provide the Client with public service for privatization and purchase of the premise. If the Department had properly provided the s public service for privatization and foreclosure of property, then the funds of the Client of the Bureau could have been spent on the purchase of the disputed premise. At the same time, the unjustified refusal of the Department to provide public services was confirmed by judicial acts of the arbitration court on other disputes that entered into force. The client was represented by Ilsur Zakirov and Semyon Garayan, senior lawyers of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Moscow Arbitration Court refused to satisfy the application for the installment of the execution of a judicial act, adopted as a result of the satisfaction of the claim of the Client of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De Jure” in the framework of a corporate dispute. Based on the results of consideration of the application, the arbitration court agreed with the position of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” that there were no good reasons for granting an installment plan and refused to satisfy it. The interests of the Principal were represented by Marina Nikolaenko, head of the practice of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.