March 2 Main results of the day

The Leninsky District Court of Yekaterinburg city approved the amicable agreement prepared by lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De Jure”, according to which the place of residence of the children was determined with the Principal of the Bureau, the proceedings were terminated. The interests of the Principal were represented by Roman Volkomorov, lawyer of the Tyumen branch of the Bureau of Lawyers “De Jure”.

The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled on the claim of the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” for the recovery of funds under a supply contract, which, according to the Defendant, was not concluded and was not executed. The Defendant stated that he had never signed, concluded or given instructions to conclude a disputed contract, and also had not received the goods from the Principal of the Bureau, in connection with which he filed a petition for the appointment of a handwriting examination and an examination of the seal impression in the disputed contract. The Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to prove that the Defendant’s petition for the appointment of a forensic examination has no legal significance, and the Defendant himself misleads the court and acts in bad faith. Moreover, by not declaring falsification of evidence, the opponent is trying to avoid negative consequences from a knowingly unfounded statement of falsification (which is a deliberately false denunciation and entails criminal liability for the Defendant).As evidence of the conclusion of the supply contract, the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” present other contracts concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the same date as the disputed contract, having identical signatures of the Defendant, the purpose of which is the execution of the state contract with the institution. At the lawyer’s request, the institution received documents confirming the fulfillment of the Principal’s obligations under the disputed supply contract, including the identity of the Defendant’s signatures in the disputed contract and in the documents submitted by the institution; the use of the same software for the functioning of the goods, as well as a single place for the execution of contracts and state contracts. The preparation of the legal position was carried out by Rashid Gitinov, head of practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, and Irina Novikova, senior lawyer of the Bureau. Irina Novikova, senior lawyer of the Bureau, defended the interests of the Principal in court.