April 7 Main results of the day

The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District has left unchanged the judicial acts on the claim of a legal entity for recognition of ownership of a residential building and a land plot. The client of the Bureau acted in this case as a third party on the Defendant’s side. The lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to convince the court that the applicant unreasonably makes demands on property that does not belong to him, abusing his rights. The chain of transactions for the sale of real estate by the Client to third parties is recognized as legal. The rights and legitimate interests of the Client of the Bureau were represented by Marina Nikolaenko, head of practice of MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Moscow Arbitration Court fully satisfied the claim of the Client of the Bureau of Lawyers “De Jure”, recovering more than 49 million rubles from the company that acted in bad faith towards our Client as payment for the refusal to perform the contract. As part of this case, our Client’s counterparty agreed on a large volume of supply of petroleum products for the execution of a government contract, but as a result refused to buy this product due to problems with lending. Lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” proved that the refusal to fulfill the contract is provided for by the agreement of the parties, but only with the condition of payment of 10% compensation from the amount of unpurchased goods. The procedural opponent of our Client did not recognize the debt, tried to delay the process and misled the Court in every possible way, proving that the Client of the Bureau allegedly did not intend to fulfill the contract himself, however, taking into account the evidence presented by us and the legal position, the Court fully satisfied the stated claim. The rights and legitimate interests of the Client were represented by Yakov Bulut, Head of the Practice of Resolving Economic Disputes of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.