May 23 Main results of the day

The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal refused the procedural opponents of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” to satisfy the appeal against the decision of the court of first instance. Earlier, within the framework of this dispute, the Moscow Arbitration Court refused to satisfy a claim to invalidate the actions of the Rosreestr Office in Moscow on the suspension and further refusal of state registration of a previously arisen property right at the request of the procedural opponents of the Bureau. The purpose of the stated claim was actually the removal of a stationary advertising structure in the center of Moscow from the property of the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. But the lawyers of the Bureau managed to prove the groundlessness of the stated requirements, as well as the wrong way of protecting the right chosen by the Plaintiff. The Court of Appeal also upheld the legal position of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. The Principal’s interests were represented by Nikita Filippov, Head of the Bureau, the Bureau’s lawyer Nikolay Polusitov participated in the formation of the position.

The Krasnogorsk City Court of the Moscow Region refused to satisfy the debtor’s administrative claim against the bailiff service of the Krasnogorsk District. The Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” defended the interests of the Claimant and the Bailiff Service for Enforcement proceedings, during which the debtor’s apartment was evaluated and sold. Taking into account the change in the economic situation, the debtor tried to increase the initial sale value of the property and thereby repay the balance of the debt in full, retaining the second object of collateral, which is under implementation. The Bailiff did not personally participate in the process. The interests of the Claimant and the Bailiff were represented by Sergey Bibikov, senior lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Moscow Regional Court satisfied the appeal of the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, canceled the decision of the court of first instance and completely dismissed the claim against the debtor, which is in bankruptcy proceedings. In this case, the lawyers of the Bureau defended the interests of the creditor, who participated in the case as a third party, and proved the imaginary transactions between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, on the basis of which the court of first instance satisfied the claim for the recovery of more than 300 million rubles. The legal position of the Bureau was that, despite the existence of loan agreements between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the long-term failure by the Defendant to fulfill his obligations and at the same time the issuance of new loans by the Plaintiff testify to the lack of money in loans, the imaginary nature of contracts and a fictitious increase in accounts payable for the purpose of causing harm to other creditors of the debtor. This legal position was fully supported by the court of appeal, which restored the time limit for filing an appeal and refused, as a result of considering the dispute according to the rules of first instance, to satisfy the claim in full in the absence of any objections from the Defendant himself. The interests of the Principal were represented by Ilsur Zakirov, senior lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.

The Moscow City Arbitration Court, after making a decision to dismiss the class action lawsuit filed against the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, appreciated the work of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” and fully satisfied the application of the Principal for recovery of court costs for the total amount of 730 thousand rubles. The interests of the Principal were represented by Yakov Bulut, lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.