The justice of the peace of the judicial precinct № 375 of the Arbat district of Moscow returned to the authorized body the materials of the case on an administrative offense against the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. The Principal was accused of committing an administrative offense under the first part of Article 20.25 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (evasion from the execution of an administrative punishment). In connection with the actual non-execution of the administrative penalty, there were significant risks of administrative arrest for up to fifteen days against the Principal. But within the framework of the consideration of the case, the lawyer of the Bureau managed to prove the need to return the case materials for revision due to the incompleteness of the submitted materials and the incorrect drawing up of a protocol on an administrative offense. The return of materials allows in the future applying for the termination of proceedings in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations. The interests of the Principal were represented by Semyon Garayan, lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District agreed with the arguments of Yuliy Darinsky, lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, and canceled earlier judicial acts on bringing the Principal to administrative responsibility in the form of a fine in the amount of 300 thousand rubles. In the court of cassation, the lawyer of the Bureau managed to prove that the lower courts, when making their decisions, did not fully establish the circumstances significant for the case and the Principal’s guilt was not proved by the materials of the case. As a result, the illegal decisions were canceled and the case was sent for a new trial.