The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the ruling of the Moscow Arbitration Court on bringing persons controlling the debtor to subsidiary liability. Lawyers of the Bureau represented the interests of one of the key creditors of the debtor and supplemented the position on the dispute declared by the bankruptcy trustee. As a result of well-coordinated work and the presentation of irrefutable evidence in the case, more than 17 million rubles were collected jointly and severally from the former managers of the Debtor. An attempt to delay a court dispute by postponing a statement received from one of the former managers was stopped by the court of appeal. The interests of the bankruptcy creditor in the framework of a separate dispute were represented by Irina Morozova, Senior lawyer of the Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution Practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Moscow Arbitration Court denied in full the claims filed against the Client of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” about gratuitous work to restore the telephone sewer. During the consideration of the case, the Plaintiff attracted a co-defendant, and also clarified the requirements – the Plaintiff asked to satisfy the claims against both Defendants jointly and severally. The Plaintiff did not prove the fault of our Principal, the work under the work contract was carried out by another person. The interests of the Principal were represented by Irina Morozova, Senior lawyer of the Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution Practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.