In a corporate dispute, the procedural opponents of our Principal could not recover from him losses in the amount of more than 7 million rubles. The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court, which denied the recovery of losses from our Principal in full. Lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” proved to the court the groundlessness of the claims of the director, who was removed from the management, and the participant of the company to the current head. In order to achieve a positive result on the dispute, the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” has developed an extensive strategy, including the conduct of judicial and extrajudicial measures; all potential risks have been identified and minimized. The interests of the Principal were represented by Nikolay Polusitov, senior lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
In a dispute under a lease agreement, the Principal was able to prove that there were no grounds for recovering a penalty in the amount of more than 2 million rubles from him. The Moscow Arbitration Court refused the Principal’s counterparty to collect a penalty for the untimely transfer of the leased object. The court agreed with the position of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” on the impossibility of recovering a penalty in case of inconsistency in the contract of a specific date or period of transfer, since the tenant for the entire period of the contract did not show interest in receiving the leased object. In addition, the court took into account that the leased object was to be transferred after the repair work, the deadline for which was also not agreed by the parties. The interests of the Principal were represented by Ilsur Zakirov, senior lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.