The Moscow City Court upheld the decision of the Izmailovsky District Court to terminate the proceedings against the Principal on the imposition of an administrative fine in the amount of 300 thousand rubles. The bureau’s lawyers managed to convince the courts of first and appeal instances of the need to terminate the proceedings in the case due to the fact that the authorized body did not draw up a protocol on an administrative offense. At the same time, the offense was recorded with the direct participation of an employee, and not in automatic mode. The interests of the Principal were represented by Dan Khorolets, lawyer of the practice of resolving economic disputes of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
As part of a corporate dispute, the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District agreed with the arguments of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” that there were no grounds for suspending the proceedings in the case and refused to satisfy the cassation appeal of the procedural opponent. Thus, an attempt by an unscrupulous Defendant to delay the existing dispute about the recovery of losses from him in the amount of more than 50 million rubles and his exclusion from the participants was prevented. The interests of the Principal were represented by Maria Ovchinnikova, Head of the Department of Legal Support of Contractual and Judicial Work of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Moscow Arbitration Court, within the framework of a bankruptcy case of an individual, refused in full to satisfy the request of the financial manager to take interim measures against the Debtor’s property, as well as to establish a temporary restriction on the Debtor’s right to leave the Russian Federation. Lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” prepared motivated objections to the requirements of the financial manager, with which the court fully agreed. The interests of the Debtor were represented by Irina Morozova, senior lawyer of the Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution Practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.