Lawyers of the contract practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” have successfully completed a number of transactions for the sale of the Principal’s assets in the amount of more than 200 million rubles. In order to eliminate existing risks and restructure the system of ownership of the owner’s property, essential conditions were promptly agreed with counterparties, and an understanding was reached on all issues. As a result, the goals set by the Principal were achieved in full. The interests of the Principal were represented by Larisa Kuzina and Elena Ivanova, Senior Lawyers of the Contractual Practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Moscow City Court upheld the decision of the Preobrazhensky District Court of Moscow, by which the decision of the MADI on imposing an administrative fine in the amount of 300 thousand rubles on the Principal was canceled and the proceedings were terminated. Lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” found that when imposing a sentence, the administrative body violated the procedure for the proceedings, which led to the illegal issuance of a decision without drawing up a protocol. In addition, on the eve of the session in the court of appeal, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation approved the resolution of the Plenum, in which it changed its position regarding the calculation of procedural deadlines for appeal. The new position was immediately used by lawyers of the Bureau and taken into account by the court. Thus, the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to convince the court of appeal that the MADI violated the procedure for the proceedings and the administrative body missed the deadline for appeal. The interests of the Principal were represented by Dan Khorolets, lawyer of the practice of resolving economic disputes of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.
The Moscow Arbitration Court agreed with the arguments of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” and refused the bankruptcy creditor to satisfy his application for inclusion of claims in the register of creditors’ claims. The size of the initially declared claims amounted to more than 40 million rubles and was based on the alleged fact of non-return of property under the lease agreement. Lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to refute the Plaintiff’s evidence, convincing the court that there was no debt and that the property had been returned to the Plaintiff, as well as that the subsequent claims were unfounded. The interests of the Principal were represented by Daria Ivanova, Senior Lawyer of the Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution Practice of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.