December 18 Main results of the day

The Moscow Arbitration Court fully refused to satisfy the Principal’s procedural opponents’ claims for the return of the advance payment and satisfied the Principal’s counterclaim to impose on the Buyer the obligation to accept and pay for the delivered goods. The essence of the dispute was that a conflict arose between the Buyer and the Supplier under the supply agreement on the basis of disagreements regarding the remaining shelf life of the goods. Refusing to accept the delivered goods, the Buyer argued that this period must necessarily be more than one year, and then declared termination of the contract and demanded a refund of the advance payment, additionally indicating that the goods were improperly labeled. However, during the trial, the Bureau’s lawyers managed to refute all the opponent’s arguments and prove that the delivered goods complied with the terms of the contract on quality and assortment, and the claims made by the Buyer regarding its labeling were insignificant. The interests of the Supplier were represented by Yakov Prisyazhnyuk, Head of the practice of resolving economic disputes of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, and Alexander Uchaykin, senior lawyer of the Bureau.

During the enforcement proceedings, the bailiff issued orders to seize the movable and immovable property of the Principal. Lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, having familiarized themselves with the materials of the enforcement proceedings, came to the conclusion that the bailiff violated the procedure established by law and appealed against illegal decisions that grossly violated the rights of the debtor within the framework of enforcement proceedings. Based on the results of consideration of the complaint, the higher State body agreed with the Bureau’s arguments and canceled the illegally made arrests. The Principal has the right to dispose of the property belonging to him without any restrictions. The interests of the Principal were represented by Semyon Garayan, lawyer of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”.