On December 25, 2019, the Ninth arbitration court of appeal overturned the decision of the court of the first instance to recover 25 million rubles from LLC “E” – a manufacturer and supplier of binding materials. The claim to the company was presented by LLC “f”, which had a delivery contract with LLC “E”. According…
The plaintiff (citizen M*) appealed to Simonovsky district court of Moscow and filed a statement of claim against the defendant (our Principal) for the recovery of unjust enrichment such as repair work, made by the plaintiff in the apartment, the owner of which is our Principal. “Bureau of advocates “De jure” lawyers got acquainted in…
MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” protects the rights and legitimate interests of one of the prestigious educational institutions of Moscow – “P”. The Plaintiff (citizen K*) appealed to court of Moscow and filed a statement of claim against the Defendant (our Principal) on the refund of money for the education of her child, as…
The Company “1” (hereinafter the Plaintiff, the Principal) appealed to MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” to provide them with legal assistance in protection of their violated rights having explained that between them and the Company “2” (hereinafter — the Defendant, Contractor, Forwarder, Carrier) a public offer Agreement for the provision of delivery services was…
State Agency (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff) has filed a claim against our Principal (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant) for the recovery of funds in the amount of about 20 million rubles to the budget of Moscow. In support of the stated requirements, the Plaintiff referred to the fact that the Principal did…
In the framework of the bankruptcy case, the bankruptcy Trustee of the Debtor (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff, Debtor) appealed to Arbitration Court of the Moscow region with the claim to invalidate a number of money transfer transactions in favor of our Principal (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant, the Creditor). The Plaintiff motivated…
The former Landlord of the disputed property (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff) filed a statement of claim against our Principal (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant) to invalidate the contract of sale concluded between the Defendant and the State Unitary Enterprise of Moscow “REM”. According to the Plaintiff, there was no condition in the…
