By the ruling of the Moscow City Court, the decision of the court of first instance on the complete refusal to satisfy the Principal’s claims to recover the income received by the Defendant from renting his apartments in the center of Moscow was canceled. In the case, a new decision was made to jointly recover…
The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal agreed with our arguments and rejected the contractor’s appeal Another victory in the construction contract! A few months ago, we won a contract dispute in the court of first instance, protecting the interests of our Principal- the customer of the contract work. The judicial work was preceded by the…
The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the court of first instance to resolve disagreements regarding the price of privatization of non-residential premises, by which the price of the property purchased by the Principal was reduced by 25 million rubles. In support of the appeal, the municipal authority indicated that when determining…
The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the court of first instance to resolve disagreements regarding the price of privatization of non-residential premises, by which the price of the property purchased by the Principal was reduced by 25 million rubles. In substantiation of the appeal, the municipal authority indicated that when determining…
By the efforts of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” it was possible to defend the interests of the Principal; he was brought to subsidiary liability in the amount of more than 3 billion rubles! The Principal’s procedural opponent, using the materials of the criminal case, appealed to the arbitration court with…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement between the Principal (a leading Russian engineering and construction center) and an IT company in the amount of 2 million rubles, which subsequently filed claims against the Principal of the Bureau for debt collection under the Agreement for the provision of communication services at the construction site.…
The Moscow Arbitration Court left without consideration the claim of the procedural opponents against the Principal. The Plaintiff filed claims against the Principal of the Bureau for the debt collection under the Agreement for the provision of medical services at the construction site. However, the Bureau employees managed to convince the court that the Principal’s…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement between construction companies in the amount of 2 million rubles. The Plaintiff filed claims against the Principal of the Bureau for debt collection under the agreement for the provision of communication services at a construction site. During the legal dispute, the parties managed to reach an agreement…
The Moscow Arbitration Court fully satisfied the Principal’s claim and collected in his favor the debt under the supply agreement in the amount of 28 million rubles. The peculiarity of the project was that the Defendant at the time of consideration of the case was already in the liquidation procedure, and an application for declaring…
The Moscow Arbitration Court dismissed the claim against the Principal for debt collection in the amount of 1.9 million rubles under a construction contract for additional work. The peculiarity of the process was that, within the framework of this agreement, several other processes were carried out in parallel, similar in their subject matter. This circumstance…
