The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal upheld the decision, which preserved the extension to the Principal’s building. Refusing to satisfy the claim of the Moscow Government and the DGI against the Principal for the demolition of the extension, the court agreed with the arguments of lawyers about the presence of contradictions and lack of objectivity…
The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District sided with the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” on the claim of the Principal to exclude the procedural opponent from the membership of the company and to recover losses from him and the firms controlled by him totaling more than 39 million rubles. Disputes about…
The Moscow Arbitration Court refused to satisfy the claims for 1.2 million rubles. A dispute arose between the customer (Principal) and the contractor (Opponent) regarding the contract for the provision of premises to employees. The Principal concluded an agreement, paid for the services and signed an act of services rendered. The opponent claimed that he…
The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow recovered from a foreign citizen in favor of the Bureau’s Principal 49.8 million rubles of the principal debt and 23.5 million rubles of interest accrued both under the contract and in accordance with Articles 811 and 395 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (actually “double interest”), with…
Ekaterina Bulygina, the Bureau’s senior lawyer, today managed to defend the Principal’s right to early recovery of debt under the loan agreement. The Moscow City Court overturned the decision of the Butyrsky District Court of Moscow, which refused to satisfy the Principal’s demands for early collection of debt under the loan agreement. The appellate instance…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement between the Principal (a leading Russian engineering and construction center) and an IT company in the amount of 2 million rubles, which subsequently filed claims against the Principal of the Bureau for debt collection under the Agreement for the provision of communication services at the construction site.…
The Moscow Arbitration Court defended the interests of the company, the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, in its claim to recognize the additional agreement to the contract as not concluded. The court found convincing the arguments of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” about the lack of prior approval…
The amount of losses reduced by more than 27 million rubles by the employees of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” survived the cassation! The Second Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction upheld the decision of the Moscow City Court, which partially satisfied the claims of the opponents of the Principal of the Bureau and…
The Moscow Arbitration Court dismissed the claim against the Principal for debt collection in the amount of 1.9 million rubles under a construction contract for additional work. The peculiarity of the process was that, within the framework of this agreement, several other processes were carried out in parallel, similar in their subject matter. This circumstance…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement on the Principal’s claim, prepared by lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. The essence of the requirements was to recover damages (in connection with the construction of temporary buildings and structures for the construction of a federal road) from the General Contractor, who suspended work…
