The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement between the Principal (a leading Russian engineering and construction center) and an IT company in the amount of 2 million rubles, which subsequently filed claims against the Principal of the Bureau for debt collection under the Agreement for the provision of communication services at the construction site.…
The Moscow Arbitration Court defended the interests of the company, the Principal of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, in its claim to recognize the additional agreement to the contract as not concluded. The court found convincing the arguments of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” about the lack of prior approval…
The amount of losses reduced by more than 27 million rubles by the employees of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” survived the cassation! The Second Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction upheld the decision of the Moscow City Court, which partially satisfied the claims of the opponents of the Principal of the Bureau and…
The Moscow Arbitration Court dismissed the claim against the Principal for debt collection in the amount of 1.9 million rubles under a construction contract for additional work. The peculiarity of the process was that, within the framework of this agreement, several other processes were carried out in parallel, similar in their subject matter. This circumstance…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement on the Principal’s claim, prepared by lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”. The essence of the requirements was to recover damages (in connection with the construction of temporary buildings and structures for the construction of a federal road) from the General Contractor, who suspended work…
The Moscow Arbitration Court preserved the Principal’s outbuilding. Refusing to satisfy the claim of the Moscow Government and the Moscow City Property Department against the Principal, the court agreed with the arguments of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” about the presence of contradictions and lack of objectivity in the conclusions of…
The Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction put a final point in the dispute over the invalidation of the resolution of the Moscow Government regarding the inclusion of a building owned by the Principal in the list of objects for which the tax base is determined as the cadastral value. Leaving the judicial acts in…
The Moscow Arbitration Court refused to satisfy the claim against the Principal under the contract, agreeing with the arguments of the lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” about the improper performance by the Plaintiff (contractor under the contract) of its obligations both in terms of the scope of work (the work was completed…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement in the case of recovery of damages (in connection with the purchase of construction materials) on the claim of the Principal against the General Contractor, who first suspended the work and then unilaterally changed the previously agreed scope of work. The legal position of the Bureau’s lawyers…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement on the Principal’s claim, prepared by lawyers of the Bureau of Lawyers “De jure”, on the recovery of interest for the use of other people’s funds under a contract for the preparation of design and survey work. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the defendant fully…
