The Moscow Arbitration Court refused to satisfy the claims for 1.2 million rubles. A dispute arose between the customer (Principal) and the contractor (Opponent) regarding the contract for the provision of premises to employees. The Principal concluded an agreement, paid for the services and signed an act of services rendered. The opponent claimed that he…
The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow recovered from a foreign citizen in favor of the Bureau’s Principal 49.8 million rubles of the principal debt and 23.5 million rubles of interest accrued both under the contract and in accordance with Articles 811 and 395 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (actually “double interest”), with…
Ekaterina Bulygina, the Bureau’s senior lawyer, today managed to defend the Principal’s right to early recovery of debt under the loan agreement. The Moscow City Court overturned the decision of the Butyrsky District Court of Moscow, which refused to satisfy the Principal’s demands for early collection of debt under the loan agreement. The appellate instance…
On 30.01.2024, the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District upheld judicial acts on refusal to establish a creditor competing with the Principal in the amount of 190 million rubles! Earlier, the courts of the first and appellate instance recognized the claims as justified, but the Court of Cassation satisfied the complaint prepared by lawyers of…
The decision to collect a debt of about 7 million rubles for completed work has come into force! The Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal, having considered the complaint of the general contractor and rejecting his arguments, upheld the court’s decision to recover in favor of the Principal of the Bureau debts for work performed and…
The Moscow Arbitration Court satisfied the claim of the Principal of the Bureau for the recovery of unjustified enrichment in the amount of more than 3.5 million rubles from a foreign supplier due to termination of the supply contract. The complexity of the case was not only in the specifics of considering a dispute involving…
The Vakhitovsky Court of the city of Kazan completely acquitted the client of lawyer Alexander Pogodin, in a criminal case of fraud with damages in the amount of 11 million rubles. The Investigative Committee and the prosecutor’s office accused Alexander Pogodin’s client of fraud in two episodes, the first of which is related to the…
The Presnensky District Court of Moscow satisfied the Principal’s claims for the collection of debt under loan agreements in the amount of more than 40 million rubles. The Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” managed to prove the baselessness of the Defendant’s arguments, as a result of which the court agreed with the position of the…
The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District resolved the dispute in favor of the Principal, sending the case for a new hearing. A dispute arose between the buyer (Principal) and the supplier on the basis of disagreements regarding the volume of the delivered goods and the final balance between the parties. The supplier claimed that…
The Principal in the case (an individual) was accused under Part 3 of Article 171. 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, namely, illegal gambling using gaming equipment outside the gambling zone, committed by an organized group, associated with the extraction of income on an especially large scale. The Tverskoy District Court of…
