By decision of the Podolsk City Court dated February 29, 2024, the claims of the Bureau’s Principal to recover 46 million rubles from the debtor under the loan agreement were satisfied. Moreover, during the consideration of the case, the Bureau of Lawyers “De Jure” managed to restore the collateral, which, as the court recognized, was…
The Moscow Arbitration Court recognized the Principal’s claims in the amount of 5.9 million rubles as justified and included them in the register of claims of the debtor’s creditors as secured by a pledge of property. The dispute was complicated by the fact that the debtor objected to the collateral status by providing information about…
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved the settlement agreement and terminated the bankruptcy proceedings of the Principal of the Bureau, whose debt to creditors exceeded 50 million rubles. In addition, the court terminated proceedings on all separate disputes in the framework of the bankruptcy case. Thanks to the concluded settlement agreement, the Principal will pay off…
The Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal defended the interests of the Principal, leaving unchanged the ruling on challenging the transaction of his debtor. A correctly developed position in the appellate court, as well as evidence previously collected and presented to the court of first instance, allowed the lawyers of the MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De…
The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District terminated the proceedings on the cassation appeal of a person affiliated with the debtor against judicial acts that established the collateral status of the Principal. Lawyers of the MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” convinced the court that the cassator had no right to file a complaint, and…
The exclusive right of the Principal was defended in the intellectual property court! Initially, the opponents in the case appealed to the arbitration court with a claim to ban the use of the design object – the snowplow control panel, pointing out that the control panel used by the Principal as part of the snowplow…
The Moscow Arbitration Court refused to satisfy the claims for 1.2 million rubles. A dispute arose between the customer (Principal) and the contractor (Opponent) regarding the contract for the provision of premises to employees. The Principal concluded an agreement, paid for the services and signed an act of services rendered. The opponent claimed that he…
The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow recovered from a foreign citizen in favor of the Bureau’s Principal 49.8 million rubles of the principal debt and 23.5 million rubles of interest accrued both under the contract and in accordance with Articles 811 and 395 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (actually “double interest”), with…
Ekaterina Bulygina, the Bureau’s senior lawyer, today managed to defend the Principal’s right to early recovery of debt under the loan agreement. The Moscow City Court overturned the decision of the Butyrsky District Court of Moscow, which refused to satisfy the Principal’s demands for early collection of debt under the loan agreement. The appellate instance…
On 30.01.2024, the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District upheld judicial acts on refusal to establish a creditor competing with the Principal in the amount of 190 million rubles! Earlier, the courts of the first and appellate instance recognized the claims as justified, but the Court of Cassation satisfied the complaint prepared by lawyers of…
