The principal, who worked in the past as Chairman of the Bank’s board, appealed to lawyers on the fact of non-payment to him additional compensation in the amount of 5 000 000 rubles under the Supplemental Agreement to the Employment contract upon dismissal.

The grounds for refusing to pay additional compensation are those circumstances that, despite the assurances and guarantees provided for by the Supplemental Agreement, the asset quality of the Employer and its affiliate has significantly deteriorated during the period when the Employee performed the duties of the Chairman of the Bank’s board. In addition, the Bank…

Events, Богомолова Т.А., Филиппов Н.В.

20.12.2018 TUSHINSKY DISTRICT COURT OF MOSCOW FULLY SATISFIED OUR CLAIM, HAVING RECOVERED MORE THAN 27 MILLION RUBLES IN FAVOR OF OUR CLIENT FROM AN UNSCRUPULOUS BORROWER AND HIS GUARANTOR.

In order to enforce the debt arising from loan agreements, we were approached by a client who concluded two loan agreements with a friend in January 2017 for a total of ~ 20 million rubles. As it often happens, by the date the money was refunded, the debtor and his guarantor stopped contacting our client…

Events, Булут Я.С.

THE CASE WAS WON IN MOSCOW ARBITRATION COURT: THE СOURT REFUSED TO SATISFY THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS TO RECOVER GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF ABOUT 20 MILLION RUBLES FROM OUR PRINCIPAL

State Agency (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff) has filed a claim against our Principal (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant) for the recovery of funds in the amount of about 20 million rubles to the budget of Moscow. In support of the stated requirements, the Plaintiff referred to the fact that the Principal did…

Events, Мартыненко Ю.М.

The case was won in the Arbitration court of the Moscow region: the court denied the Plaintiff to invalidate transactions on the transfer of funds in the amount of more than 1 million rubles to our Principal

In the framework of the bankruptcy case, the bankruptcy Trustee of the Debtor (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff, Debtor) appealed to  Arbitration Court of the Moscow region with the claim to invalidate a number of money transfer transactions in favor of our Principal (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant, the Creditor). The Plaintiff motivated…

Events, Мартыненко Ю.М.

The case was won in Moscow Arbitration Court on a claim against our Principal regarding the invalidation of the contract of sale of an object of cultural heritage

The former Landlord of the disputed property (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff) filed a statement of claim against our Principal (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant) to invalidate the contract of sale concluded between the Defendant and the State Unitary Enterprise of Moscow “REM”. According to the Plaintiff, there was no condition in the…

Events, Мартыненко Ю.М.

The Principal appealed to a lawyer to establish the fact of acceptance of the inheritance under court order.

On May 15, 2018, Savelovsky District Court of Moscow denied the Principal’s claim with reference to the unproven fact of accepting the inheritance, failure to provide evidence of missing a deadline for applying for a notary with an application for acceptance of the inheritance for valid reasons, despite of the large number of evidence in…

Events, Богомолова Т.А.